This Easter
I'm not sure how many of you have noticed but ever since we did the study on the accuracy of the bible, there was a flurry of news report abt the discovery of the Gospel of Judas after 1,700 years (pg 2, Straits Times 8 Apr, sat). In this gospel (author unknown), the writer claims that Judas was corroborated to betray Jesus by Jesus himself. In the ST articles, it is said that "Jesus entrusted Judas with special knowledge & ask him to betray him to the Roman authorities. By doing so, Judas will 'exceed' the other disciples". This intriguing copy of the Gospel of Judas was found somewhere in Egypt and was dated to be around 300AD. In fact, the Gospel of Judas is the highlight for this month's National Geographic and an entire TV programme has been devoted to this 'gospel'. Interestingly, another article cropped up in today's ST pg 27 written by this lady called Elaine Pagels and reproduced from New York Times. Anyone who has read the article called "Why the 'Lost Gospels' Lost Out" in the Real Bible Code bible study notes will find the name Elaine Pagels familiar. Further to the Pagels' article, she wrote many times that Jesus is said to have revealed a sacred mystery to Judas and that many of the other gospels, like the one by Judas, offer secret teaching and secret writings. By this, she is referring to the Gospel of Thomas, Gospel of Mary Magdalene (the focus of the Da Vinci Code) and the Gospel etc. also collectively known as the Gnostic Gospels. She claimed that early Christians in the period after Jesus' death regarded these secret gospels not as radical alternatives to the New Testament gospels but as advanced level teaching for those who already received Jesus' basic message. She thinks that these secret books, which contained paradox and mystery akin to the mystical teachings of Kabbalah (Madonna's religion), were not considered suitable for beginners. She even ended her article with this, "Those who go to church may find their Easter reflections more mysterious than ever." Mysterious indeed. For those of us who followed the Real Bible Code studies, we will be able to point out a few things:
1) that all these emphasis on secretive or mysterious teaching sounds a tad too familiar to the Gnostics understanding of salvation. basically, in the footnote of "The Canon of the New Testament", gnostics are a group of false teachers who emphasized the need to have direct and special knowledge (Gk : gnosis) of God in order to be saved. where Christianity emphasizes the role of Christ's act of redemption on the cross as the basis of our salvation, Gnostics taught that one's salvation depended on the individual possessing intuitive knowledge (gnosis) of the mysteries of the universe and of magic formulas. the Gnostics are labelled as preaching heresy by the early church father, Ireneaeus in the 2nd century. hence, the controversy surrounding the Gospel of Judas is as old as time itself. the early church has rightfully termed it as heretic but of course, now, with renewed interest from readers of Da Vinci Code and with scholars like Pagel, it is seeing a resurgence.
2) the other noteworthy thing about the Gospel of Judas is its dating. it is dated (by the admission of the group of scholars assembled by National Geographic Society) around 300AD. this is a good 200+ years after the death of Jesus, which means that any accounts in this gospel about Jesus cannot be disproved because the eyewitnesses and those close to Jesus will probably be dead by then! this is similar to other gnostic texts which only cropped up a hundred years after Jesus' death (in the 2nd and 3rd centuries) and after New Testament books were already recognised as authoritative and widely circulated. basically, gnostic texts, like Gospel of Phillip, Gospel of Mary etc. mostly draws on the accounts in the NT books and added in some new ideas about Jesus and about the faith. based on the Gospel of Judas' dating, it fails 2 tests - that of apostolicity and identity. the writer is not known and hence, his closeness to any of the apostles can't be ascertained.
3) consider this line from the Gospel of Judas purportedly said by Jesus to Judas, "Step away from the others and i shall tell you the mysteries of the kingdom. it is possible for you to reach it, but you will grieve a great deal." for those of us who are familiar with the writings of the Gospel of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John will know that there is a great departure from what Jesus said to Judas. not only that but the idea of 'the mysteries of the kingdom' is quite foreign from how Jesus taught about the kingdom as expressed in the NT gospels. in fact, from our recent studies of John, Jesus taught not of the 'mysteries' of the kingdom but rather, that the kingdom is here and that whoever believes in His name will enter this kingdom. the onus now is on us to receive this kingdom. in Luke, Jesus is said to preach the good news abt the kingdom. in fact, that is why he was sent to earth (Lk 4:43). consider this verse from Luke 8:10 - He said, "The knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of God has been given to you, but to others I speak in parables, so that, " 'though seeing, they may not see; though hearing, they may not understand.' to us as believers, the idea of the kingdom of God is not some mysterious and obscure understanding but it is something within grasp as Christ has fully revealed it to us. in that sense, the Gospel of Judas fails 2 tests - textual consistency with the other recognised gospels and writing style.
this is what's said about the Gnostic Gospels as extracted from Greg Clarke's "Is It Worth Believing" (pg 101) :
"When you read them (the Gnostic texts), you find that they are not very much like the Bible at all, especially when it comes to information about Jesus. In the Bible's Gospels, we have three strongly historical narratives of Jesus birth, early life, teachings and miracles, and then his path to crucifixion and then resurrection (see Matthew, Mark and Luke). In the Gospel of John, we have a more stylised and poetic account of Jesus' teachings, miracles and passion events. But even the Nag Hammadi texts with the word 'Gospel' in the title (e.g. The Gospel of Truth, The Gospel of Philip, The Gospel of Mary) are very different from the 'orderly account' (Luke 1:3) that Luke has set out to write. Only The Gospel of Thomas looks anything like a biography of Jesus. For e.g, The Gospel of Philip is a series of statements about light and darkness, baptism, marriage, adultery and overcoming evil. It contains some mention of Jesus, but it is not a narrative of Jesus' life. In comparison with the biblical texts, the Gnostic texts are extremely obscure, fragmented, and difficult to make sense of."
i think we clearly live in times where what's mystical and spiritual sounds the most attractive to us. which is pretty much why New Age spiritualism, Zen Buddhism, neo-Judaistic Kabbalah, Scientology etc. seems so appealing, counting among its adherents people like Madonna, Tom Cruise, Richard Gere and countless others. in church camp speaker Mike Raiter's words, this world has become something of a spiritual marketplace. you choose what works best for you (heavily paraphrased without permission from "Stirrings of the Soul"). people like Elaine Pagels have come and gone in the 2nd century and will continue to come and then go. our sureness in the Scripture comes from our understanding that despite men's folly, biased, manipulation and politicking, what is now preserved for us as the Bible comes as a result of God's grace and the guidance of the Holy Spirit (2 Pet 1:16-21). this easter, i urged each one of us to take a good look at the Bible on our laps and reflect on God's faithfulness in wanting to reveal His whole counsel to us.
1) that all these emphasis on secretive or mysterious teaching sounds a tad too familiar to the Gnostics understanding of salvation. basically, in the footnote of "The Canon of the New Testament", gnostics are a group of false teachers who emphasized the need to have direct and special knowledge (Gk : gnosis) of God in order to be saved. where Christianity emphasizes the role of Christ's act of redemption on the cross as the basis of our salvation, Gnostics taught that one's salvation depended on the individual possessing intuitive knowledge (gnosis) of the mysteries of the universe and of magic formulas. the Gnostics are labelled as preaching heresy by the early church father, Ireneaeus in the 2nd century. hence, the controversy surrounding the Gospel of Judas is as old as time itself. the early church has rightfully termed it as heretic but of course, now, with renewed interest from readers of Da Vinci Code and with scholars like Pagel, it is seeing a resurgence.
2) the other noteworthy thing about the Gospel of Judas is its dating. it is dated (by the admission of the group of scholars assembled by National Geographic Society) around 300AD. this is a good 200+ years after the death of Jesus, which means that any accounts in this gospel about Jesus cannot be disproved because the eyewitnesses and those close to Jesus will probably be dead by then! this is similar to other gnostic texts which only cropped up a hundred years after Jesus' death (in the 2nd and 3rd centuries) and after New Testament books were already recognised as authoritative and widely circulated. basically, gnostic texts, like Gospel of Phillip, Gospel of Mary etc. mostly draws on the accounts in the NT books and added in some new ideas about Jesus and about the faith. based on the Gospel of Judas' dating, it fails 2 tests - that of apostolicity and identity. the writer is not known and hence, his closeness to any of the apostles can't be ascertained.
3) consider this line from the Gospel of Judas purportedly said by Jesus to Judas, "Step away from the others and i shall tell you the mysteries of the kingdom. it is possible for you to reach it, but you will grieve a great deal." for those of us who are familiar with the writings of the Gospel of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John will know that there is a great departure from what Jesus said to Judas. not only that but the idea of 'the mysteries of the kingdom' is quite foreign from how Jesus taught about the kingdom as expressed in the NT gospels. in fact, from our recent studies of John, Jesus taught not of the 'mysteries' of the kingdom but rather, that the kingdom is here and that whoever believes in His name will enter this kingdom. the onus now is on us to receive this kingdom. in Luke, Jesus is said to preach the good news abt the kingdom. in fact, that is why he was sent to earth (Lk 4:43). consider this verse from Luke 8:10 - He said, "The knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of God has been given to you, but to others I speak in parables, so that, " 'though seeing, they may not see; though hearing, they may not understand.' to us as believers, the idea of the kingdom of God is not some mysterious and obscure understanding but it is something within grasp as Christ has fully revealed it to us. in that sense, the Gospel of Judas fails 2 tests - textual consistency with the other recognised gospels and writing style.
this is what's said about the Gnostic Gospels as extracted from Greg Clarke's "Is It Worth Believing" (pg 101) :
"When you read them (the Gnostic texts), you find that they are not very much like the Bible at all, especially when it comes to information about Jesus. In the Bible's Gospels, we have three strongly historical narratives of Jesus birth, early life, teachings and miracles, and then his path to crucifixion and then resurrection (see Matthew, Mark and Luke). In the Gospel of John, we have a more stylised and poetic account of Jesus' teachings, miracles and passion events. But even the Nag Hammadi texts with the word 'Gospel' in the title (e.g. The Gospel of Truth, The Gospel of Philip, The Gospel of Mary) are very different from the 'orderly account' (Luke 1:3) that Luke has set out to write. Only The Gospel of Thomas looks anything like a biography of Jesus. For e.g, The Gospel of Philip is a series of statements about light and darkness, baptism, marriage, adultery and overcoming evil. It contains some mention of Jesus, but it is not a narrative of Jesus' life. In comparison with the biblical texts, the Gnostic texts are extremely obscure, fragmented, and difficult to make sense of."
i think we clearly live in times where what's mystical and spiritual sounds the most attractive to us. which is pretty much why New Age spiritualism, Zen Buddhism, neo-Judaistic Kabbalah, Scientology etc. seems so appealing, counting among its adherents people like Madonna, Tom Cruise, Richard Gere and countless others. in church camp speaker Mike Raiter's words, this world has become something of a spiritual marketplace. you choose what works best for you (heavily paraphrased without permission from "Stirrings of the Soul"). people like Elaine Pagels have come and gone in the 2nd century and will continue to come and then go. our sureness in the Scripture comes from our understanding that despite men's folly, biased, manipulation and politicking, what is now preserved for us as the Bible comes as a result of God's grace and the guidance of the Holy Spirit (2 Pet 1:16-21). this easter, i urged each one of us to take a good look at the Bible on our laps and reflect on God's faithfulness in wanting to reveal His whole counsel to us.

